SKU获得更多流量,提升竞争力

SKU获得更多流量,提升竞争力

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 1:

SKU ได้รับการเข้าชมมากขึ้นและเพิ่มความสามารถในการแข่งขัน

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 2:

Due to the fact that psychophysical scaling is relative to
context, where stimuli are contrasted with those immediately
preceding, we decided to collect intensity and hedonic
ratings subsequent to the measurement of odor frequency.
After each single measurement of 10 minutes’ duration the
panelist had to evaluate Wrst intensity and then hedonic tone
on the second page of the data record form (see Fig. 2).
When making this decision only the positive records of the
source-speciWc odor and not all of the 60 samples were considered.
To assess odor intensity a six-point scale with values
from “1—very weak”, “2—weak”, “3—distinct”, “4—
strong”, “5—very strong” to “6—extremely strong”
(Guideline VDI 3882 Part 1 1992, page 9) was used. The
panelists were advised to use their own response time as a
hint and give this score at a point where the odor quality is
immediately identiWable and clearly evident. Having only
those records with source speciWc odors in mind, the panelist
evaluated how strong the strongest odor impression
was, how often it occurred (5—point scale from “1—
rarely” to “5—always”) and then he estimated the average
odor impression (6—point intensity scale). In assessing
hedonic tone a nine-point scale with values ranging from
“¡4—extremely unpleasant” through “0—neither pleas-

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 3:

SKU ได้รับการจราจรมากขึ้นและเพิ่มความสามารถในการแข่งขัน